Consumer Credit Consultancy and Training |
|
HIRE-PURCHASE TERMINATION An example of the common law mitigation rule, which states that a claim may not be made which benefits the claimant to a greater extent than his losses, nor which punishes the defendant. Mr R. obtained a Mini Mayfair for £3050 in February 1987. He paid a deposit of £500 and the balance was to be paid on hire-purchase over 36 months. Included in the Total Charge for Credit was a £10 Option to Purchase fee. The monthly payments were £92.37, of which he made only one. Mr R. lost his job in March 1987, returned the car to the garage, and subsequently emigrated. The car was resold by the garage for only £1600. A county court issued a plaint 516 days after the termination date. What is R.'s liability?
There are two ways of determining R's liability to the finance company: (a) Termination (s.100 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974)
(b) Settlement of agreement based on common law rules for compensation
The plaintiff must therefore claim £1057.26, less than his apparent right under termination of the hire-purchase agreement. © Bob Imrie 26 October 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||